Glossary entry

Polish term or phrase:

indeks hodowlany

English translation:

expected progeny differences

Added to glossary by literary
Jun 13, 2015 17:55
8 yrs ago
7 viewers *
Polish term

indeks hodowlany

Polish to English Tech/Engineering Livestock / Animal Husbandry
stada świń

Discussion

literary (asker) Jun 14, 2015:
możliwe, że to coś skandynawskiego
geopiet Jun 13, 2015:
total merit index? Optimally, this goal will be reached, if selection is based on total merit index where traits included are properly weighted according to appropriate economic values for each trait. - http://www.mtt.fi/afs/pdf/mtt-afs-v16n2p79.pdf - page 79 (Economic values of pork production related traits in Finland)
geopiet Jun 13, 2015:
What is NTM?
NTM (Nordic Total Merit) is the most complete total merit index in the world. NTM consists of more than 40 subtraits combined into 12 main traits as shown in the figures. When you use NTM as selection criteria, you obtain positive progress for all traits of economic importance in the dairy cattle industry. - http://www.vikinggenetics.com/about-us/understand-the-benefi...
geopiet Jun 13, 2015:
Skandynawski Indeks Hodowlany (NTM) Zachęcamy do zapoznania się ze artykułem prezentującym Skandynawski Indeks Hodowlany (NTM). Badania przeprowadzone w Danii i Szwecji, wyraźnie dowodzą, że ten wskaźnik jest bardzo precyzyjny i wiarygodny. Drodzy Hodowcy, przy wyborze nasienia pochodzącego od skandynawskich buhajów pytajcie o indeks NTM, dzięki temu wasze stado będzie zdrowsze i wydajniejsze. - http://www.genetyka.phkonrad.pl/index.php/1kariera/15-news/5...

Proposed translations

5 hrs
Selected

expected progeny differences

Different countries may have different indices. This is the one used in the USA. The Polish index is presently being expanded to include further characteristics.

cccccc
Expected progeny differences (EPD) are an evaluation of an animal’s genetic worth as a parent. They are based on animal models which combine all information known about an individual and its relatives to create a genetic profile of the animal’s merits. These profiles are then compared only to other individuals of the same breed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_progeny_difference

cccccccccccccccc

Expected Progeny Difference (EPD) , is the prediction of how future progeny of each animal are expected to perform relative to the progeny of other animals listed in the database. EPDs are expressed in units of measure for the trait, plus or minus. Interim EPDs may appear on young animals when their performance has yet to be incorporated into the American Angus Association National Cattle Evaluation (NCE) procedures. This EPD will be preceded by an "I", and may or may not include the animal's own performance record for a particular trait, depending on its availability, appropriate contemporary grouping, or data edits needed for NCE.


Calving Ease Direct (CED), is expressed as a difference in percentage of unassisted births, with a higher value indicating greater calving ease in first-calf heifers. It predicts the average difference in ease with which a sire's calves will be born when he is bred to first-calf heifers.

Birth Weight EPD (BW), expressed in pounds, is a predictor of a sire's ability to transmit birth weight to his progeny compared to that of other sires.

Weaning Weight EPD (WW), expressed in pounds, is a predictor of a sire's ability to transmit weaning growth to his progeny compared to that of other sires.

Yearling Weight EPD (YW), expressed in pounds, is a predictor of a sire's ability to transmit yearling growth to his progeny compared to that of other sires.

Residual Average Daily Gain (RADG), expressed in pounds per day, is a predictor of a sire’s genetic ability for postweaning gain in future progeny compared to that of other sires, given a constant amount of feed consumed.

Dry Matter Intake (DMI), expressed in pounds per day, is a predictor of difference transmitting ability for feed intake during the postweaning phase, compared to that of other sires.

Yearling Height EPD (YH), is a predictor of a sire's ability to transmit yearling height, expressed in inches, compared to that of other sires.

Scrotal Circumference EPD (SC), expressed in centimeters, is a predictor of the difference in transmitting ability for scrotal size compared to that of other sires.

Docility (Doc), is expressed as a difference in yearling cattle temperament, with a higher value indicating more favorable docility. It predicts the average difference of progeny from a sire in comparison with another sire’s calves. In herds where temperament problems are not an issue, this expected difference would not be realized.

MATERNAL EPDs
Heifer Pregnancy (HP), is a selection tool to increase the probability or chance of a sire's daughters becoming pregnant as first-calf heifers during a normal breeding season. A higher EPD is the more favorable direction and the EPD is reported in percentage units.

Calving Ease Maternal (CEM), is expressed as a difference in percentage of unassisted births with a higher value indicating greater calving ease in first-calf daughters. It predicts the average ease with which a sire's daughters will calve as first-calf heifers when compared to daughters of other sires.

Maternal Milk EPD (Milk), is a predictor of a sire's genetic merit for milk and mothering ability as expressed in his daughters compared to daughters of other sires. In other words, it is that part of a calf's weaning weight attributed to milk and mothering ability.

Herds (MkH) indicate the number of herds from which daughters are reported.

Daughters (MkD) reflects the number of daughters that have progeny weaning weight records included in the analysis.

Mature Weight EPD (MW), expressed in pounds, is a predictor of the difference in mature weight of daughters of a sire compared to the daughters of other sires.

Mature Height EPD (MH),expressed in inches, is a predictor of the difference in mature height of a sire's daughters compared to daughters of other sires.

Cow Energy Value ($EN), expressed in dollar savings per cow per year, assesses differences in cow energy requirements as an expected dollar savings difference in daughters of sires. A larger value is more favorable when comparing two animals (more dollars saved on feed energy expenses). Components for computing the cow $EN savings difference include lactation energy requirements and energy costs associated with differences in mature cow size.

CARCASS EPDs
Carcass Weight EPD (CW), expressed in pounds is a predictor of the differences in hot carcass weight of a sire's progeny compared to progeny of other sires.

Marbling EPD (Marb), expressed as a fraction of the difference in USDA marbling score of a sire's progeny compared to progeny of other sires.

Ribeye Area EPD (RE), expressed in square inches, is a predictor of the difference in ribeye area of a sire's progeny compared to progeny of other sires.

Fat Thickness EPD (Fat), expressed in inches, is a predictor of the differences in external fat thickness at the 12th rib (as measured between the 12th and 13th ribs) of a sire's progeny compared to progeny of other sires.

Group/progeny (C Grp/ Pg and U Grp/Pg) reflects the number of contemporary groups and the number of carcass and ultrasound progeny included in the analysis.

$VALUE INDEXES
$Value indexes are multi-trait selection indexes, expressed in dollars per head, to assist beef producers by adding simplicity to genetic selection decisions. The $Value is an estimate of how future progeny of each sire are expected to perform, on average, compared to progeny of other sires in the database if the sires were randomly mated to cows and if calves were exposed to the same environment. More Info

Weaned Calf Value ($W), an index value expressed in dollars per head, is the expected average difference in future progeny performance for preweaning merit. $W includes both revenue and cost adjustments associated with differences in birth weight, weaning direct growth, maternal milk and mature cow size.

Feedlot Value ($F), an index value expressed in dollars per head, is the expected average difference in future progeny performance for postweaning merit compared to progeny of other sires.

Grid Value ($G), an index value expressed in dollars per head, is the expected average difference in future progeny performance for carcass grid merit compared to progeny of other sires.

Quality Grade ($QG) $QG represents the quality grade segment of the economic advantage found in $G. $QG is intended for the specialized user wanting to place more emphasis on improving quality grade. The carcass marbling (Marb) EPD contributes to $QG.

Yield Grade ($YG) $YG represents the yield grade segment of the economic advantage found in $G. $YG is intended for the specialized user wanting to place more emphasis on red meat yield. It provides a multi-trait approach to encompass ribeye, fat thickness and weight into an economic value for red meat yield.
Beef Value ($B), an index value expressed in dollars per head, is the expected average difference in future progeny performance for postweaning and carcass value compared to progeny of other sires.

http://www.angus.org/NCE/definitions.aspx
cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc

Expected progeny differences (EPDs) provide estimates of the genetic value of an animal as a parent. Specifically, differences in EPDs between two individuals of the same breed predict differences in performance between their future offspring when each is mated to animals of the same average genetic merit. EPDs are calculated for birth, growth, maternal, and carcass traits and are reported in the same units of measurement as the trait (normally pounds). EPD values may be directly compared only between animals of the same breed. In other words, a birth weight EPD for a Charolais bull may not be directly compared to a birth weight EPD of a Hereford bull (unless an adjustment is made to account for breed differences).
http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/400/400-804/400-804.html
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
indeks hodowlany
Konstrukcja indeksu


Nowy indeks nie oznacza wcale, że indeks produkcyjności jest lub był indeksem złym i że należy zaniechać z jego wykorzystywania. Jest to indeks dobry i na pewno będzie wykorzystywany. Indeks ten obejmuje tylko wartość hodowlaną dotyczącą produkcji składników mleka, to jest wartości hodowlanej kilogramów białka i wartości hodowlanej kilogramów tłuszczu. Wyliczany jest według wzoru: indeks produkcyjny = 2 x wartość hodowlana kg białka + 1 x wartość hodowlana kg tłuszczu.

Tak skonstruowany indeks nie mówił nic o tak ważnych dla hodowcy cechach, jak pokrój potomstwa buhaja, cechy płodności czy skłonności do występowania zwiększonych ilości komórek somatycznych w mleku córek, a przecież te cechy funkcjonale mają olbrzymi wpływ na pozostawanie krów w stadzie lub ich zbyt szybkie brakowanie. Generalnie cechy te mają bardzo duży wpływ na opłacalność prowadzenia stada, dlatego konieczne było wprowadzenie indeksu obejmującego więcej cech.

Doprowadzenie do tego, aby dla różnych cech można było opracować jeden wzór umożliwiający dodawanie poszczególnych wyników do siebie oraz ustalenie, jak dużą część w indeksie będzie stanowić określona cecha, wymagało dokonywania szeregu przeliczeń. Przeliczenia te powodują, że podane w szczegółowych tabelach liczby dotyczące wartości hodowlanych różnią się od tych podanych w podindeksach. Różnice wynikają z konieczności przeliczeń, a nie z błędów.

Podstawowy wzór indeksu PF je st następujący: PF = 0,5 x podindeks produkcyjny + 0,3 x podindeks pokroju + 0,1 x podindeks płodności + 0,1 x wartość hodowlana dla zawartości komórek somatycznych. Tak skonstruowany indeks oznacza, że cechy produkcyjne stanowią w tym indeksie 50 proc., cechy pokroju – 30 proc., cechy płodności – 10 proc., wartość hodowlana dla komórek somatycznych – 10 proc
http://www.farmer.pl/produkcja-zwierzeca/bydlo-i-mleko/hodow...
Something went wrong...
2 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "raczej ten skandynawski "merit index""

Reference comments

4 hrs
Reference:

Doskonalenie cech produkcyjnych i funkcjonalnych u bydla mlecznego - zbiorczy indeks hodowlany

Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D.
27 mins
agree Jacek Konopka
14 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search